?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Older Entry | Newer Entry

Architecture anyone?

There is something about old buildings and stuff which catches my fancy.
It is so interesting to note that in earlier days people used to take so much care of their possessions. Perhaps not as in 'take care of it', but make it as pretty as possible. Embellishments and elaborate work on every inch of it. Huge architectural structures would be constructed with intricate design all over it, perhaps different on each wall corner!
You can see this right from the Medieval Era to somewhere around the second world war.

Then suddenly there was this radical shift to 'simplicity'. Sure, simple is elegant, what a single swoop of line can convey is amazing, and can be equated to the hard work required to manage a well worked on decorated piece. Yet, simplicity gets monotonous after a while. White looks good. White in all its different shades is mesmerising. However, it is mutilated everywhere. It is only the very talented that can manage the ease and beauty of simple lines. Like the much talked about simple cuts of dresses, only the much trained and highly gifted can achieve the mesmerising sense of wonder with a single simple stroke. The rest can only manage an imitation which is coarse and clumsy, if not a fragment of their imagination - horribly gone wrong.

But what I like about those intricately made colossal buildings is the care, thought, and perseverence taken to make it. Somehow, bending a sheet of steel to a required shape does not seem to match up to the grandeur factor. Dont get me wrong, I love the skyline of a modern city. But I do love the older detailed roofs and structures of yore.

Like rexzilla mentions in his recent post, there was a time when plastic was not available, and pure linen and real cutlery was made available on common transport.
In parts of India, you still get tea served in small terracotta cups - use and throw - rather than in the tiny almost-non-degradable plastic cups, which are not only non-reusable, but also made manually, with a need for human care. Sometimes this taken-for-granted thing seems like a luxury.

Sure, linen napkins except in the most swanky of restaurants may evoke a hint of doubt in the minds of most. however, if it is a regular phenomenon, how much sweeter everything would be.

Is it just the much hyped 'pace of life' that has brought forth this change? This shift from detailed luxury to the streamlined efforts of today?

But yes, I still love the time, effort and grandeose beauty of elaborately decorated buildings, massive collosal structures with details you can get lost in, the smallest, simplest device made pretty by brass embellishments and silken tassles, the beauty of a silken/ brocaded cover v/s a plastic or polymer sheet, the china v/s the microwave resistant melomoware, the paper/ cloth doilies which covered everything rather than the dust-proof, water proof material of today. :)
Sure it may be practically difficult - a decade to build a building, a number of levers to a touch of a button, frailty vs crack proof and of course water resistant vs water and even bacteria / dust proof. But, there is a beauty and sense of satisfaction in pulling 3 levers and then rotating another few to do something compared to the simple touch of one button.

For, beauty and grandiose never did compare to practical and simple. The Grand world where the Crowned Monarch was looked upon from a distance cannot be captured by one where the President is called by his first name by all ages. [Aside: Perhaps that is the reason why 'celebrities' are revered today.]

Perhaps thats the reason I would rather spend an hour staring at Victoria Terminus (notwithstanding the history) and only five in front of Signature Towers.

Digg!
 |  submit to reddit  |   |  Del.icio.us
___________________________________________________________

Comments

( 4 comments — Leave a comment )
sashdude
7th Aug, 2007 07:31 (UTC)
yes
Practicality aside, it is greed which is prevalent now. Most buildings are built to cram the most people into and make money off them, none really cares how it looks, this is not just true of apartments alone, even other buildings as well, such as the one i inhabit here. Also missing is passion, it is like between keating and howard roarke, in the fountainhead.
There are a few buildings which do combine beauty with practicality, like the Chrysler building and the Kremlin and one more which slips my mind now, but there again, practicality ultimately triumphs, is it because of the day that we are in or otherwise i know not. Still you have churned my mind with your post enough for me to have a wikipedia window permanently open ;)
dippyblogs
7th Aug, 2007 09:29 (UTC)
Re: yes
yeah, far n few between. i mean the towers in Dubai may be tall, but I guess the Qutab minar is prettier. Heck! i bet the Babel tower was prettier.
(Anonymous)
7th Aug, 2007 10:12 (UTC)
JM… the post reminds me of Ayn Rand
dippyblogs
8th Aug, 2007 05:11 (UTC)
just cuz i mention building?! tch! tch!
( 4 comments — Leave a comment )

About Me


Regurgitations of my mind. Specific, Vague, Memorable, Forgettable, Thoughtless, In-depth.

More variegated than your dreams or colours off a crystal. More than I can pen down. What I can, you can read.


Subscribe
Search within this site below:







myspace profile visitor

Page Summary

Latest Month

August 2016
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Lizzy Enger